DNA and protein targeting 1,2,4-triazole based water soluble dinickel(II) complexes enhances antiproliferation and lactate dehydrogenase inhibition

Water soluble dinickel(II) complexes Ni-2(L)(2)(1-2)](NO3)(4) (1-2), where L1-2 are triazole based dinucleating ligands, were synthesized and characterized. The DNA binding, protein binding, DNA hydrolysis and anticancer properties were investigated. The interactions of complexes 1 and 2 with calf thymus DNA were studied by spectroscopic techniques, including absorption and fluorescence spectroscopy. The DNA binding constant values of the complexes 1 and 2 were found to be 2.36 x 10(5) and 4.87 x 10(5) M-1 and the binding affinities are in the following order: 2 > 1. Both the dinickel(II) complexes 1 and 2, promoted the hydrolytic cleavage of plasmid pBR322 DNA under both anaerobic and aerobic conditions. Kinetic data for DNA hydrolysis promoted by 1 and 2 under physiological conditions give the observed rate constants (k(obs)) of 5.05 +/- 0.2 and 5.65 +/- 0.1 h(-1), respectively, which shows 10(8)-fold rate acceleration over the uncatalyzed reaction of ds-DNA. Meanwhile, the interactions of the complex with BSA have also been studied by spectroscopy. Both the complexes 1 and 2 display strong binding propensity and the binding constant (K-b), number of binding sites (n) were obtained are 0.71 x 10(6) 1.47] and 5.62 x 10(6) 1.98] M-1, respectively. The complexes 1 and 2 also promoted the apoptosis against human carcinoma (HeLa, and BeWo) cancer cells. Cytotoxicity of the complexes was further confirmed by lactate dehydrogenase enzyme level in cancer cell lysate and content media. (c) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Novel roles of the SRP RNA in co-translational protein targeting

The signal recognition particle (SRP) and its receptor (SR) are universally conserved protein machineries that deliver nascent peptides to their proper destination. The SRP RNA is a universally conserved and essential component of SRP, which serves as the “catalyst” of the protein targeting cycle. The SRP RNA accelerates SRP-SR complex formation at the beginning of the protein targeting reaction, and triggers GTP hydrolysis and SRP-SR complex disassembly at the end. Here we combined biochemical and biophysical approaches to investigate the molecular mechanism of the functions of the SRP RNA. We found that two functional ends in the SRP RNA mediate distinct functions. The tetraloop end facilitates initial assembly of SRP and SR by mediating an electrostatic interaction with the Lys399 receptor, which ensures efficient and accurate substrate targeting. At the later stage of the SRP cycle, the SRP-SR complex relocalizes ~ 100 Angstrom to the 5’,3’-distal end of the RNA, a conformation crucial for GTPase activation and cargo handover. These results, combined with recent structural work, elucidate the functions of the SRP RNA during the protein targeting reaction.

A study of protein targeting reveals insights into mitigating protein aggregation

A unique chloroplast Signal Recognition Particle (SRP) in green plants is primarily dedicated to the post-translational targeting of light harvesting chlorophyll-a/b binding (LHC) proteins. Our study of the thermodynamics and kinetics of the GTPases of the system demonstrates that GTPase complex assembly and activation are highly coupled in the chloroplast GTPases, suggesting they may forego the GTPase activation step as a key regulatory point. This reflects adaptations of the chloroplast SRP to the delivery of their unique substrate protein. Devotion to one highly hydrophobic family of proteins also may have allowed the chloroplast SRP system to evolve an efficient chaperone in the cpSRP43 subunit. To understand the mechanism of disaggregation, we showed that LHC proteins form micellar, disc-shaped aggregates that present a recognition motif (L18) on the aggregate surface. Further molecular genetic and structure-activity analyses reveal that the action of cpSRP43 can be dissected into two steps: (i) initial recognition of L18 on the aggregate surface; and (ii) aggregate remodeling, during which highly adaptable binding interactions of cpSRP43 with hydrophobic transmembrane domains of the substrate protein compete with the packing interactions within the aggregate. We also tested the adaptability of cpSRP43 for alternative substrates, specifically in attempts to improve membrane protein expression and inhibition of amyloid beta fibrillization. These preliminary results attest to cpSRP43’s potential as a molecular chaperone and provides the impetus for further engineering endeavors to address problems that stem from protein aggregation.

Phospholipids and a protein-conducting channel regulate cotranslational protein targeting

Signal recognition particle (SRP) and signal recognition particle receptor (SR) are evolutionarily conserved GTPases that deliver secretory and membrane proteins to the protein-conducting channel Sec61 complex in the lipid bilayer of the endoplasmic reticulum in eukaryotes or the SecYEG complex in the inner membrane of bacteria. Unlike the canonical Ras-type GTPases, SRP and SR are activated via nucleotide-dependent heterodimerization. Upon formation of the SR•SRP targeting complex, SRP and SR undergo a series of discrete conformational changes that culminate in their reciprocal activation and hydrolysis of GTP. How the SR•SRP GTPase cycle is regulated and coupled to the delivery of the cargo protein to the protein-conducting channel at the target membrane is not well-understood. Here we examine the role of the lipid bilayer and SecYEG in regulation of the SRP-mediated protein targeting pathway and show that they serve as important biological cues that spatially control the targeting reaction.

In the first chapter, we show that anionic phospholipids of the inner membrane activate the bacterial SR, FtsY, and favor the late conformational states of the targeting complex conducive to efficient unloading of the cargo. The results of our studies suggest that the lipid bilayer acts as a spatial cue that weakens the interaction of the cargo protein with SRP and primes the complex for unloading its cargo onto SecYEG.

In the second chapter, we focus on the effect of SecYEG on the conformational states and activity of the targeting complex. While phospholipids prime the complex for unloading its cargo, they are insufficient to trigger hydrolysis of GTP and the release of the cargo from the complex. SecYEG modulates the conformation of the targeting complex and triggers the GTP hydrolysis from the complex, thus driving the targeting reaction to completion. The results of this study suggest that SecYEG is not a passive recipient of the cargo protein; rather, it actively releases the cargo from the targeting complex. Together, anionic phospholipids and SecYEG serve distinct yet complementary roles. They spatially control the targeting reaction in a sequential manner, ensuring efficient delivery and unloading of the cargo protein.

In the third chapter, we reconstitute the transfer reaction in vitro and visualize it in real time. We show that the ribosome-nascent chain complex is transferred to SecYEG via a stepwise mechanism with gradual dissolution and formation of the contacts with SRP and SecYEG, respectively, explaining how the cargo is kept tethered to the membrane during the transfer and how its loss to the cytosol is avoided.

In the fourth chapter, we examine interaction of SecYEG with secretory and membrane proteins and attempt to address the role of a novel insertase YidC in this interaction. We show that detergent-solubilized SecYEG is capable of discriminating between the nascent chains of various lengths and engages a signal sequence in a well-defined conformation in the absence of accessory factors. Further, YidC alters the conformation of the signal peptide bound to SecYEG. The results described in this chapter show that YidC affects the SecYEG-nascent chain interaction at early stages of translocation/insertion and suggest a YidC-facilitated mechanism for lateral exit of transmembrane domains from SecYEG into the lipid bilayer.

Investigating the Role of the GET3-GET4/GET5 Interaction During Tail-Anchor Protein Targeting

The proper targeting of membrane proteins is essential to the viability of all cells. Tail-anchored (TA) proteins, defined as having a single transmembrane helix at their C-terminus, are post-translationally targeted to the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) membrane by the GET pathway (Guided Entry of TA proteins). In the yeast pathway, the handover of TA substrates is mediated by the heterotetrameric Get4/Get5 (Get4/5) complex, which tethers the co-chaperone Sgt2 to the central targeting factor, the Get3 ATPase. Although binding of Get4/5 to Get3 is critical for efficient TA targeting, the mechanisms by which Get4 regulates Get3 are unknown. To understand the molecular basis of Get4 function, we used a combination of structural biology, biochemistry, and cell biology. Get4/5 binds across the Get3 dimer interface, in an orientation only compatible with a closed Get3, providing insight into the role of nucleotide in complex formation. Additionally, this structure reveals two functionally distinct binding interfaces for anchoring and ATPase regulation, and loss of the regulatory interface leads to strong defects in vitro and in vivo. Additional crystal structures of the Get3-Get4/5 complex give rise to an alternate conformation, which represents an initial binding interaction mediated by electrostatics that facilitates the rate of subsequent inhibited complex formation. This interface is supported by an in-depth kinetic analysis of the Get3-Get4/5 interaction confirming the two-step complex formation. These results allow us to generate a refined model for Get4/5 function in TA targeting.

Manipulation der Aktin-Hülle später Endosomen durch ektopisches Protein-Targeting und Etablierung einer in vivo-Hierarchie cytoplasmatischer Targeting-Signalstärken

Der Endocytoseweg in Dictyostelium verläuft über definierte endosomale Reifestadien. Dabei werden die reifenden Endosomen im letzten Stadium durch eine Schicht aus filamentösem Aktin umhüllt. Über die biologische Funktion dieser Aktin-Hülle ist derzeit wenig bekannt. Zum weiteren Erkenntnisgewinn sollten daher unterschiedliche Aktin-interagierende Proteine an die endosomale Aktin-Hülle dirigiert und die sich daraus ergebenden Folgen untersucht werden. Dabei wurde der in Drengk et al., 2003 beschriebene Ansatz aufgegriffen, in dem Proteine durch die Fusion an Vacuolin an die späte endosomale Membran transportiert wurden. Die endosomale Lokalisation von DAip1 bewirkte den vollständigen Verlust der endosomalen Aktin-Hülle, ohne dabei das restliche zelluläre Cytoskelett zu beeinträchtigen. Dabei wird die Depolymerisation vermutlich über die nachgewiesene Interaktion von DAip1 mit dem Aktin-depolymerisierenden Protein Cofilin bewirkt. Einhergehend damit trat eine Aggregation der betroffenen Kompartimente, eine Verzögerung des endocytotischen Transits, sowie eine verstärkte Retention lysosomaler Enzyme auf. Diese Ergebnisse ließen auf eine Funktion der endosomalen Aktin-Hülle als Fusionsinhibitor oder in der Regulation von Recycling-Prozessen an späten Endosomen schließen. Die Verlängerung der endosomalen Verweilzeit des den Arp2/3-Komplex negativ regulierenden Proteins Coronin bewirkte dagegen keine offensichtlichen Veränderungen in den betroffenen Zellen. Diese Beoachtung könnte ein Indiz dafür sein, dass nach der Ausbildung der Aktin-Hülle keine weiteren essentiellen Arp2/3-abhängigen mehr an der endosomalen Membran auftreten. Die endosomale Lokalisation des Aktin-Crosslinkers ABP34 induzierte ebenfalls keine Abweichungen vom Wildtyp-Verhalten. Hierbei besteht allerdings die Möglichkeit, dass die Aktivität des Proteins durch die bereits zuvor beschriebene Calcium-Sensitivität beeintächtigt vorliegt. Eine Verstärkung der endosomalen Hülle konnte trotz der Verwendung unterschiedlicher Ansätze nicht hervorgerufen werden. Offensichtlich wirkt die zusätzliche Expression zentraler Regulatoren der Aktin-Polymerisation in der Zelle cytotoxisch. Die Bindung von VASP an die endosomale Membran bewirkte in den Zellen die Ausbildung voluminöser, cytoplasmatischer „Aktin-Bälle“. Diese riefen in den betroffenen Zellen Defekte in unterschiedlichen Aktin-abhängigen Prozessen, wie der Phago- und Pinocytose, sowie der Cytokinese hervor. Dabei gehen die beobachteten Veränderungen vermutlich auf die nachgewiesene Störung im Gleichgewicht zwischen G- und F-Aktin zurück. Obwohl die Aktin-Bälle an der endosomalen Membran entstehen, weisen sie nach vollendeter Entstehung keine inneren oder äußeren Membranen mehr auf und nehmen nicht mehr aktiv am endocytotischen Geschehen teil. Die nähere Charakterisierung offenbarte große Ähnlichkeit zu den mit unterschiedlichen neurodegenerativen Erkrankungen assoziierten Hirano-Bodies. Über das beobachtbare Lokalisationsverhalten der unterschiedlichen im ersten Teil der Arbeit eingesetzten Vacuolin-Hybridproteine ließ sich die Stärke der Lokalisationsinformationen der fusionierten Aktin-interagierenden Proteine miteinander vergleichen. Dies wurde verwendet, um die einzelnen Proteine gemäß ihres Targeting-Potenzials hierarchisch anzuordnen. Im zweiten Teil der Arbeit wurden dieser Hierarchie die beiden cytoplasmatischen Targeting-Signale für Peroxisomen (PTS1) und den Zellkern (SV40-NLS) hinzugefügt. Der vorgenommene Vergleich dieser in vivo gewonnen Daten aus Dictyostelium mit unterschiedlichen in vitro-Bindungsstudien mit homologen Proteinen anderer Organismen zeigte eine erstaunlich gute Übereinstimmung. Diese Beobachtung lässt auf vergleichbare Targeting-Affinitäten innerhalb der Eukaryoten schließen und belegt, dass die zelluläre Lokalisation eines Proteins relativ sicher anhand der in ihm vorhandenen Bindungs-Affinitäten vorhergesagt werden kann. Durch die Kombination der in vivo- und in vitro-Daten war es auch ohne Kenntnis des Oligomerisierungsgrades und des Interaktionspartners erstmals möglich, die Bindungsstärke von Vacuolin an der endosomalen Membran auf einen definierten Bereich einzugrenzen.

In Vitro Studies with Purified Components Reveal Signal Recognition Particle (SRP) and SecA/SecB as Constituents of Two Independent Protein-targeting Pathways of Escherichia coli

The molecular requirements for the translocation of secretory proteins across, and the integration of membrane proteins into, the plasma membrane of Escherichia coli were compared. This was achieved in a novel cell-free system from E. coli which, by extensive subfractionation, was simultaneously rendered deficient in SecA/SecB and the signal recognition particle (SRP) components, Ffh (P48), 4.5S RNA, and FtsY. The integration of two membrane proteins into inside-out plasma membrane vesicles of E. coli required all three SRP components and could not be driven by SecA, SecB, and ΔμH+. In contrast, these were the only components required for the translocation of secretory proteins into membrane vesicles, a process in which the SRP components were completely inactive. Our results, while confirming previous in vivo studies, provide the first in vitro evidence for the dependence of the integration of polytopic inner membrane proteins on SRP in E. coli. Furthermore, they suggest that SRP and SecA/SecB have different substrate specificities resulting in two separate targeting mechanisms for membrane and secretory proteins in E. coli. Both targeting pathways intersect at the translocation pore because they are equally affected by a blocked translocation channel.

Multifaceted Physiological Response Allows Yeast to Adapt to the Loss of the Signal Recognition Particle-dependent Protein-targeting PathwayD⃞

Translational control has recently been recognized as an important facet of adaptive responses to various stress conditions. We describe the adaptation response of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae to the loss of one of two mechanisms to target proteins to the secretory pathway. Using inducible mutants that block the signal recognition particle (SRP) pathway, we find that cells demonstrate a physiological response to the loss of the SRP pathway that includes specific changes in global gene expression. Upon inducing the loss of the SRP pathway, SRP-dependent protein translocation is initially blocked, and cell growth is considerably slowed. Concomitantly, gene expression changes include the induction of heat shock genes and the repression of protein synthesis genes. Remarkably, within hours, the efficiency of protein sorting improves while cell growth remains slow in agreement with the persistent repression of protein synthesis genes. Our results suggest that heat shock gene induction serves to protect cells from mislocalized precursor proteins in the cytosol, whereas reduced protein synthesis helps to regain efficiency in protein sorting by reducing the load on the protein translocation apparatus. Thus, we suggest that cells trade speed in cell growth for fidelity in protein sorting to adjust to life without SRP.

Understanding Co-translational Protein Targeting and Lithium Dendrite Formation through Free Energy Simulations and Coarse-Grained Models

We describe the application of alchemical free energy methods and coarse-grained models to study two key problems: (i) co-translational protein targeting and insertion to direct membrane proteins to the endoplasmic reticulum for proper localization and folding, (ii) lithium dendrite formation during recharging of lithium metal batteries. We show that conformational changes in the signal recognition particle, a central component of the protein targeting machinery, confer additional specificity during the the recognition of signal sequences. We then develop a three-dimensional coarse-grained model to study the long-timescale dynamics of membrane protein integration at the translocon and a framework for the calculation of binding free energies between the ribosome and translocon. Finally, we develop a coarse-grained model to capture the dynamics of lithium deposition and dissolution at the electrode interface with time-dependent voltages to show that pulse plating and reverse pulse plating methods can mitigate dendrite growth.

Protein subcellular targeting inTrichoderma aggressivum f. aggressivum

Trichoderma aggressivum f. aggressivum is a filamentous soil fungus. Green mold disease of commercial mushrooms caused by this species in North America has resulted in millions of dollars in lost revenue within the mushroom growing industry. Research on the molecular level of T aggressivum have jus t begun with the goal of understanding the functions of each gene and protein, and their expression control. Protein targeting has not been well studied in this species yet. Therefore, the intent of this study was to test the protein localization and production levels in T aggressivum with green fluorescent protein (GFP) with an intron and tagged with either nuclear localization signal (NLS) or an endoplasmic reticulum retention signal (KDEL). Two GFP constructs (with and without the intron) were used as controls in this study. All four constructs were successfully transferred into T aggressivum and all modified strains showed similar growth characteristics as the wild type non-transformed isolate. GFP expression was detected from all modified T aggressivum with confocal microscopy and the expression was similar in all four strains. The intron tested in this study had no or very minor effects as GFP expression was similar with or without it. The GFP signal increased over a 5 day period for all transformants, while the GFP to total protein ratio decreased over the same period for all transformants. The GFP-KDEL transformant showed similar protein expression level and localization as did the control transformant lacking the KDEL retention signal. The GFP-NLS transformant similarly failed to localize GFP into nucleus as fluorescence with this strain was virtually identical to the GFP transformant lacking the NLS. Thus, future research is required to find effective localization signals for T aggressivum.